• Home
  • About
    • Governance & Structure
      • The AER Executive Board
      • The AER General Assembly
      • The AER Political Bureau
      • Statute & strategies
        • AER Election Committee
        • AER Monitoring & Evaluation Group (MEG)
        • AER Procedures
      • The AER Secretariat
    • The History of AER
  • Members
    • Who are AER’s members?
    • Member Directory
    • AER stands with Ukraine
    • Join AER!
  • Mutual Learning
    • About Mutual Learning
    • Working Groups
    • Knowledge Transfer Events
  • Advocacy
    • About Our Advocacy Work
    • The Bureau
    • The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
    • AER Political Priorities 2025-2030
  • Projects
    • About Our Projects
    • Ongoing Projects
    • Look for Partners
    • Completed Projects
  • AER Programmes
    • AER Summer Academy
    • Eurodyssey – Paid traineeships in European regions
    • Intercultural Regions Network
    • AER Youth Regional Network (YRN)
  • Events
    • AER events
    • Other events

Assembly of European Regions

Connecting regions, inspiring Europe since 1985

You are here: Home / Search for "mental health"

Search Results for: mental health

Gävleborg: a county of cultural heritage

10 March, 2017 By Editor

With 2018 a year designated by the European Commission as European Year for Cultural Heritage, Gävleborg (SE) decided to develop a project to highlight what the region can do to promote conservation, digitisation, infrastructure, research, and skills development in the field. The recently published report Cultural Heritage Counts for Europe demonstrates that cultural heritage creates job opportunities, attracts investment, and that it can strengthen social cohesion.

Cultural heritage for all

The project developped by the Office for Cultural Development in collaboration with the Gävleborg County Administrative Board will highlight the cultural heritage of the region and ensure that it is accessible for a wider and more diverse audience. Among other things, this includes developing methods to attract people and to acquire further training in cultural heritage issues, in order to promote social inclusion and integration. The integration part is an extremely important instrument for the future and a crucial element in an election year, where the integration issues may be instrumentalised.

Gävleborg’s strategy is to use cultural heritage as a resource for achieving a sustainable and inclusive society, from the social, economic and environmental point of view. This means making cultural sites available physically, in different locations, enabling both inhabitants and visitors to experience and enjoy the natural and cultural environments.

A catalyst for exchanges

Gävleborg has particularly remarkable cultural sites in very diverse places: along the coast and watercourses, in the forest, the industrial environments, and in the cultural landscape. The European Year of Cultural Heritage is a unique opportunity for Gävleborg to invest in the cultural heritage on its entire territory. This project, therefore aims to make full use of the attractiveness and amenity value of the cultural heritage. Furthermore, it contributes to increasing the knowledge of and pride of citizens of the cultural heritage of the county. The European Year of Cultural Heritage is seen as a catalyst for exchanging and developing considerations with regards to cultural heritage, and to demonstrate the relationship between culture and cultural heritage.

One of the cultural policy objectives stresses the importance of “promoting a living cultural heritage that is conserved, used, and developed”. Well-conserved cultural sites are rich in history and are often attractive for people to visit; a resource for the public health and for social well-being. Gävleborg’s cultural heritage strategy, which has been developed in collaboration with the regional actors, underlines that the cultural heritage is a resource for achieving a socially, environmentally, and economically sustainable society. It is essential to coordinate resources to strengthen the importance of the cultural heritage, which in turn contributes to a socially sustainable and inclusive society.

The European Year of Culture will also give new impetus for follow-up actions by bringing together stakeholders and generating new collaborations and initiatives

A rich culture

The Year of Cultural Heritage will help raise awareness and further develop the county’s rich cultural heritage through various cultural expressions: music, art, film and digital media, dance, handicrafts, literature, cultural and natural environments etc. The intangible cultural heritage is highlighted as well through different activities. Stories of the county’s various cultural heritage sites shall be alive and expressive. An important part is to take advantage of the experience gained from the year of cultural heritage in order to develop and make certain operations permanent.

Senses, experiences & knowledge

The three-year project will be implemented around three main approaches:

  • Cultural heritage for all the senses
  • Cultural heritage for experiences
  • Cultural heritage for knowledge

The project will allow to carry out the inventory of sites, identify stakeholders as well as national and international actors for exchange and collaboration. Connecting potential partners will be a very important aspect of the project which will make use of commitments, tap into the wealth of inspiration and ideas for activities to develop afterward.

The Virtual Reality project, which was initiated by the world heritage site “Decorated Farmhouses of Hälsingland” will be intensified and upgraded.

In the course of 2018, activities will be organised to attract a wider audience. During the year a program is planned, including continuous lectures, demonstrations, and events.

– “Cultural heritage for all the senses” is in Jan – April. The period is characterised by arrangements on the theme of cultural heritage, based on taste (food), hearing (e.g. music), sight (exhibitions, demonstrations), and touch (handicraft).

– “Cultural heritage for experiences” is in May – Sept. Makes the cultural heritage accessible through cultural experiences, demonstrations and events, e.g. through art, theatre and music in cultural settings that reflect the cultural heritage of the county.

– Lastly, “Cultural heritage for knowledge” is in Oct – Dec. This is the period for seminars, awareness-raising activities such as classes in care and development of cultural sites and intangible cultural heritage.

Year three (2019) focuses on utilisation and dissemination of experience. Utilising contacts, initiatives for networking etc. The activities will be evaluated as a basis for what is sustainable enough to proceed with in the long run. The evaluations, which are carried out continuously during the project, are used to find further work within the ordinary activities on a regional and a local level.

Objectives

Gävleborg wants to achieve specific targets:

  • Recognition of the culture and cultural heritage of the county of Gävleborg in and outside the county.
  • Utilisation of creative ideas to create conditions for continued development with regards to the cultural heritage.
  • Creation of opportunities for inhabitants of the county and visitors to take part of the cultural heritage.
  • Increased accessibility to cultural heritage
  • Presence of cultural heritage in the county ‘s representation in various media, e.g. on the municipal and regional websites and in other forms of informational material.
  • Increased knowledge of the cultural heritage
  • Pride within the County of the cultural heritage

Share experiences & develop a project

The Gävleborg’s project is a good example of how to use a Europe-wide initiative to derive concrete impacts on region’s territory.

Cultural Heritage will be also discussed during the workshop of the sub-committee on Culture, at the AER Spring Plenary meeting, on the 23rd March 2017, in London, UK. During the workshop participants will be provided with information on funding opportunities in this framework and share experiences on financing cultural heritage in regions.

 

 

Related articles

Develop a project on cultural heritage

Committees’ Spring Plenary

Follow AER!
Facebooktwitterlinkedinrss

Project proposal on air quality: looking for partners!

2 February, 2017 By Editor

Following the Brokerage Event “Going green in Seventeen” jointly organised by AER and ERRIN, we are happy to share with AER member region a project proposal on air quality which have been presented during one of the break-out session. This project is looking for partners to join the consortia!

Green Solution for Outdoor Air Pollution

Politecnico of Milano, a scientific-technological university which trains engineers, architects and industrial designers, presented the project idea “Green Solution for Outdoor Air Pollution”, which will be submitted within Horizon 2020,in relation to the call SCC-02-2016-2017 Topic: “Demonstrating innovative nature-based solutions in cities”. It proposes to use green roofs as a solution for improving air quality and life in cities. The research aims at developing a tool capable to quantify the amount and type of reduced pollutants, obtaining the potential health benefits that green roofs can provide to the environment and population health.

As potential partners, the Politecnico of Milano is looking for experts dealing with epidemiology, urban planners, agronomists, policy makers, economists, agency bodies for the environmental monitoring and technologists.

The deadline of this call is on 7th March 2017.

More details on this project are available on the pitch presentation and the project template.

If you like to join this project and/or ask for further information, please do not hesitate to contact the AER Secretariat.

Documents and presentations from the brokerage event on green projects are available on the event page.

Follow AER!
Facebooktwitterlinkedinrss

Integrated care: tapping into social capital

2 February, 2017 By Johanna Pacevicius

Consent, Trust and Enablement in a Digital World

In the framework of the ALEC 2017 AER organised a mutual learning workshop on social capital for integrated care. Dr. Michael Rigby, Emeritus Professor of Health Information Strategy at Keele University (UK) and Deputy Principal Investigator for the MOCHA H2020 project led by the Imperial College of London on “The Informal and Formal Virtual Care Team – Consent, Trust and Enablement in a Digital World ”

We focused on stakeholder engagement, specifically on the largely untapped potential of social capital in integrated care systems. While we at least theoretically know how to involve the professionals, it is, for various technical, ethical or other reasons, difficult to enable more people around the patient to get engaged as well. Technology is only part of the answer, we need to revitalise democracy through the engagement of citizens. …

Building social capital is revitalising democracy

Currently, all AER actions are organised in the framework of the 2016-2017 focus “revitalising democracy”. The ALEC 2017 AER workshop is no exception.

Indeed just as quality care systems need the sustained participation of the people around the patient, society at large needs the constant participation of larger parts of society. In healthcare this means to go further than the next of kin and children, and look at all the other people who at some point are in contact with the patient and are eager to support them (think of the role of grandchildren, . This relates clearly with the AER declaration (r)e-inventing democracy which states

Whereas: tapping into the human capital both inside and outside institutions via IT applications could boost innovation, increase engagement, save time and financial resources;

Whereas: In a democracy the role of citizens is central and their participation is the corner stone of legitimacy; (…)

We, the Assembly of European Regions:

(…)

2. recognise the need for multi-stakeholder approaches for economic, social and politicalparticipation to face societal challenges;

3. encourage the public, private and non-governmental actors to incite citizen-led initiatives;

4. underline the importance of design in public services to provide citizens with opportunities to

contribute to the public good with their talent; (…)

 

Keywords here are “human capital” “via IT” “multi-stakeholder”

Team work to look at social capital

Participants to the AER workshop organised in teams, shared their experiences and objectives. They also committed to help each others to achieve their mutual goals in order for the workshop to have a multiplier effect on the social capital they are building during the #ALEC2017 event.

The workshop provided both scientific expertise on the topic and a gamified experience based on the methods developed and available on the QI4U eLearning platform from the Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Northwest London.

Participants looked at the stakes and mechanisms in the engagement of the people around the patient. The engagement of a broader informal care team is to be envisaged in a wider process of quality improvement. Issues discussed included authorisation, roles, recruitement, communication with and recognition of the wider informal care team.

Follow AER!
Facebooktwitterlinkedinrss

Impact investments: sustainable returns to society

16 January, 2017 By Editor

With the economic and financial crisis of the recent years, governments had to commit themselves to balance their budget and reduce public debt and deficit. These constraints have put limits to national expenditures, meaning that many social issues have been left aside because of a lack of funds.

However, youth education, social inclusion, healthcare, climate change all have a significant impact on economic development. In order to be addressed these issues need to attract investment.

What is social impact investing?

Finding innovative mechanisms to finance social improvements is not something new. Some countries have already been searching for new financial sources and for ways to better and more efficiently use tight public budgets. Many public-private partnerships have been developed in order to gather resources and improve some social conditions. Many banks helped the financing of social projects too.

Also at european level, in 2013 the EIB Group launched the first pan-European public-private partnership, the Social Impact Accelerator (SIA). It addressed the growing need for availability of equity finance to support social enterprises, promoting social inclusion, alternative sources of employment and contributing to growth. SIA reached its final closing in July 2015. More lately, the Juncker Plan and the EFSI are facilitating public-private partnerships, providing technical assistance and resources in favour of projects in specific sectors.

However, we have started to talk about impact investment. The need of greater availability of resources and better investing structures lead to think to new approaches. Companies, organisations or development funds have been attracted by impact investment, addressing social and environmental issues. According to the strategy  and the budget adopted, to the investor expectations, the project can also set a financial return below the market rate. From this idea of impact investment many initiatives and good practices have come out.

Alternative approaches and initiatives

A recent example is the Social Impact Bonds case. They are “payment by results” investments. In particular they are agreements involving public authority, investors, a service provider and an intermediary organisation. They allow to have a return to the investment only if the project developed delivers positive and measurable social outcomes.

United Kingdom has been one of the first country to use the tool of social impact bonds. Its pilot project at Peterborough Prison it’s the world’s first social impact bond used since 2010 to finance rehabilitation at work. In 2012, with the government assistance UK launched also the world’s first social investment bank, realizing projects in healthcare, education and many other social issues.

Ireland, in its Public Service Reform Plan 2014-2016, proposed Social Impact Investing (SII). This involved using private capital to fund initiatives addressing social problems, and funding is linked to results. The State agreed to repay the private investor only if the established outcomes were achieved. The project aim was searching for private sector investment partners in the housing sector in order to provide long-term, sustainable and stable homes for homeless families in the Dublin region.

Consortium for Development of Polesine (CONSVIPO), Italy. A Territorial Pact was developed to support and reinforce the local economy through information about the financial opportunities offered by regional, national and European actors, aimed at public and private initiatives. The main goals: development of the territory, establishment of a permanent local cooperation and partnership network, support sustainable development programmes and initiatives regarding the promotion of equal opportunities.

In support of the social impact investment sector, the Global Social Impact investment Steering Group (GSG) was established in 2015, as a successor of the SII Taskforce established by G8. It’s composed by members from 13 countries plus the EU and other government and network organisations. Its aim is to promote a unified view of impact investment, facilitating knowledge exchange and encouraging policy change in national markets.

AER activities in the field

Regions are exactly the places where the citizens’ needs are and also where often the gap between financial and social players needs to be fixed. This is why AER is addressing investment issues in particular via its Spring plenary meetings on 21-23 in London. Moreover, AER has been invited to participate in the Commission’s A High-Level Task Force on financing social infrastructure and maximising public in order to ensure the regional perspective is taken into account in what could become the drafting of the Juncker Plan II.

Links

AER Spring 2017 Plenary meetings

Related articles

Long term Investments, the EU and you

Investing for green projects

 

Photo credit @Flickr – askal bosch http://tinyurl.com/gtpdzhy  

Follow AER!
Facebooktwitterlinkedinrss

Looking for partners: “Cognition and Inclusion” – persons with disabilities

7 December, 2016 By Agnese Pantaloni

AER continues its focus on people with disabilities also on the projects side. Following its participation on 29 and 30 November at the European Day of Persons with Disabilities 2016 organised by the European Disability Forum and the European Commission in Brussels and the work carried out by the Working Group “Equal Europe for People with Disabilities” within AER Social Policy and Public Health Committee, it is now time to share concrete actions that could foster an inclusive society.

Den Achtkanter, a Belgian organisation supporting learning disabled adults, is looking for European partners to build the project ‘Cognition and Inclusion’ within the Erasmus+ programme.

An inclusive society adapts the environment physically and mentally to the disabled person, taking into account the ‘disabilities’ . Although this is a necessary condition, it is not a sufficient one. Also, the disabled person needs to (learn to) adapt to society, as this is an ever changing environment. This second condition addresses the ‘abilities’ and is necessary to promote learning potential, problem solving, self regulation, etc. These ‘cognitive’ skills are the basis for being able to be the director of one’s own live, to be independent, to be a full citizen who exercises his rights, etc. (Cognitive) methodologies within learning disabled (young) adults – although effective – are not well known, or are dealing with resistances based on beliefs that learning disabled people can’t develop these skills (as an element of the ‘mind set’ of the one who supports the disabled person). This project wants to share practices and produce a compendium with cognitive approaches (goal 1), and wants to develop a tool to assess the ‘mind set’ of professionals to be used in all kind of HRM-applications (selection, training, evaluation, etc).

This project foresees the following main activities:
– exchange of good practices of cognitive approaches within learning disabled adults (focusing on a specific context e.g. employment, living, etc)
– exchange of good practices focusing on methods to change belief systems/mind sets
– intellectual output: compendium of practical tools to foster general skills within learning disabled adults; training program and manual and development of a tool to assess the ‘mind set’ of professionals to be used in all kind of HRM-applications (selection, training, evaluation, etc).

Den Achtkanter is especially looking for partners who have experience in and knowledge on methodologies on the development of cognitive skills (planning, evaluation, reflection, being flexible,…) for persons with disabilities.

If you are interested to get more information and/or to join this project, please get in touch with us before Monday 12 December.

Follow AER!
Facebooktwitterlinkedinrss

The European Solidarity Corps: Acting for Europe (video)

24 November, 2016 By Editor

Although Mr Joseph Jammar, Head of Representation of the European Commission in Belgium could not take part in the Eurodyssey Forum in Cyprus, he prepared a video message for the participants to provide them with information on the future European Solidarity Corps in the framework of the conference “A fair mobility”.

The European Solidarity Corps (ESC) is conceived to offer people under 30 in Europe the chance to support a non-governmental organisation (NGO), local authority or private company active in addressing challenging situations across the European Union – for instance: rebuilding communities following natural disasters; addressing social challenges such as social exclusion, poverty, health and demographic challenges; or working on the reception and integration of refugees.
The Corps will develop its own distinct identity, rooted in the core EU values of engagement and solidarity. By joining the Corps, participants will express their commitment and willingness to devote a period of their lives to helping others. By supporting others, including the most vulnerable in our societies and communities, young people will not only put the core EU value of solidarity into practice, but also acquire skills and experience, including language skills, that can be valuable when looking for a job or considering further education and training.

Source: European Commission RAPID database

Eurodyssey is the AER youth mobility programme used by regions as a tool to tackle unemployment and provide their young people with a concrete way to improve their CV and professional experience. Eurodyssey prides itself in the quality of its exchanges which is the result of careful matching for each participant in the programme and a tailored approach to ensure a win-win situation for the young person and the company.

Follow AER!
Facebooktwitterlinkedinrss

EFSI: a concrete opportunity for regions

24 November, 2016 By Editor

The Investment Plan for Europe, also known as “Juncker Plan“, adapted in 2014, is built around three pillars:

  • the European Fund for Strategic Investment (EFSI)
  • the European Investment Project Portal (EIPP) and the European Investment Advisory Hub (EIAH)
  • Improving Investment Environment.

The focus of the AER briefing seminar on 30 November with EC Vice president Jirki Katainen will be on EFSI, the main instrument for boosting investment, employment and economic growth in general. The total investment target is EUR 315 billion in additional to public and private investment over the next three years. EFSI has been launched together with the EIB Group – European Investment Bank and European Investment Fund – and the European Commission.

The activities on which EFSI focuses are strategic infrastructures; education, research, development and innovation; expansion of renewable energy and resource efficiency; support for smaller businesses and midcap companies.

The objective to support the recovering of the real economy after the economic and financial crisis. This is done by providing financial support to valuable projects, which can deliver investment opportunities in the local community, in a long-term perspective. Almost half of the target has already been mobilised (EUR 154 bn), covering a geographical area of 27 out of 28 EU countries. The main sectors involved are smaller companies, energy, RDI, digital and transport. A smaller percentage involves transport, environment and social infrastructures.

Challenges

As the EFSI has been integrated into the EIB Group, it is subject to its Project cycle and governance. Projects to be eligible must be economically and technically sound, in at least one of the EFSI eligible sectors, contributing to EU objectives, mature enough to be bankable and priced in a manner commensurate with the risk taken. These requirements can be difficult and demanding for regions or SMEs which may already experience difficulties in meeting their balance budget or in developing well-structured and long-term projects.

Therefore the challenges for the EFSI to become more attractive are the following:

  • improve accessibility, by information and promotion
  • provide instruments to overcome the financial gap: for instance adapting the requirements
  • provide instruments to overcome the capacity gap: facilitating the project structure, providing help to build good projects in the right sector
  • gain visibility at the very local level
  • gain credibility by the impact of the other projects implementation
  • overcome minimum requirements for the size of the projects: for instance for midcap companies the loan volume must be between 7.5 and 25mln. For projects under 25mln EIB provides intermediate loans to local, regional and national banks.
  • overcome the slow disbursement of the loan: in fact the project is signed subject to the fulfilment of pre-disbursement conditions and after signature the project remains under consideration for six months.

Pioneering regions

Here there are some good examples of projects, well developed and approved in the framework of Juncker Plan, coming from the following regions:

–Grand Est: QUAERO EUROPEAN INFRASTRUCTURE FUND (2016) France

EUR 40mln in equity participation will enable the Quaero European Infrastructure Fund to attract other investors. This Fund provides equity financing for projects in the fields of social infrastructure, transport, telecoms, energy and public or private amenities.

-Rhône-Alpes: LYCEES – REGION RHONE-ALPES (2014) France

EUR 500mln to renovate and upgrade upper secondary schools. Part of the project’s investment is targeted towards the Region’s contribution to health and medicine-related higher education. The aim of the project is to improve education infrastructure and to increase energy efficiency of educational buildings in the region.

-North Braband: EVIDES WATER SUPPLY (2014) Netherlands

EUR 175 mln to support Evides’ capital investment programme 2014-2018 aimed at maintaining the quality and functionality of its water and distribution pipelines, basins and production installations among others. The aim is to  secure a sustainable management of water supply and distribution, bringing about positive social and environmental impacts.

-Gelderland: DYKE STRENGTHENING GELDERLAND Netherlands

EUR 182 mln to raise and widen river dykes along various sections of Rhine, Waal, Ijssel and Meuse (Gelderland). The aim is to strengthen the dikes along these rivers to protect and improve citizen’s physical safety and their quality of life. 

 

On 30 November, in the framework of the AER series of events “Investing in the future: new perspectives for the regions“, the Vice President of the European Commission in charge of investments Jyrki Katainen will give clarifications about the implementation of the EFSI. Regions can share their questions in advance by contacting AER coordinator for Institutional Relations Alexandre Brecx ([email protected]).

 

Photo credits of featured picture: Benjamin Turquier @Flickr http://tinyurl.com/j9aw78z

Other related articles

EFSI & the Circular Economy

Closing the loop: funding opportunities for circular economy projects

AER meeting with Jirki Kattainen on EFSI

Getting the most out of the European Fund for Strategic Investments

 

Follow AER!
Facebooktwitterlinkedinrss

Sustainable mobility: the way forward

7 November, 2016 By Johanna Pacevicius

The modernisation and democratisation of means of transports have radically changed how we perceive distances and the world in general. At the same time resource scarcity, climate change and geopolitical stakes have obliged us to re-think models of mobility.

Sustainable mobility: a brand new world

From 7 to 10 November AER members are gathered in Izmir (TR) on the occasion of the Fall Plenary meetings of the 3 AER thematic Committees. The overarching theme of this series of meetings is sustainable mobility, because mobility is first of all access – to work, education, goods and services including health, friends and family. Choices in mobility therefore directly affect the competitiveness of territories but also rural-urban relations, territorial and social cohesion, fairness in terms of health or education, energy security, the circular economy etc

An energy intensive sector

According to the Fifth Asessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, transports account for 14% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Trends in transport are impacted by population growth and changes in demographics as well as by changes in the structure of the economy. The shift to a service economy among other things considerably  increases the weigh of transport in greenhouse gas emissions as for instance retail and other services depend on energy-intensive infrastructure.

Connectivity: essential for regional development

For regions, connectivity is an essential element for economic development. For Europe this is also a question of territorial cohesion, a matter for which AER has consistently been lobbying. This is why members in the working groups on transports and energy have focused on different aspects of connectivity including railway, regional airports, and electric vehicles.

“Sustainable”, what’s in a word?

Defining mobility as sustainable refers to the ability of individuals to provide for their needs without compromising the same ability to future generations. To minimise the negative impact of greenhouse gas emissions, individuals need information, motivation and/ or incentives to promote more sustainable solutions for instance public transport or bicycles, instead of individual cars. The key challenge is to meet environmental, economic and societal sustainability. With the new role of subnational entities and organisations, after COP21, regions more than ever have a crucial role in implementing environmentally responsible and sustainable policies.

Regions: the way forward

Sustainable transports and mobility therefore require a holistic approach which goes far beyond the remit of spatial planners. But more importantly sustainable mobility requires mutual learning and experience sharing because the time is now. Regions have a tremendous potential to make the change happen and they are doing it already.

 

More Links

IPCC report on Transport
EC Studies on sustainable transport

Photo credits Tambako The Jaguar @Flickr http://tinyurl.com/jbmxbsx

Follow AER!
Facebooktwitterlinkedinrss

Baltic Rim Economies: special edition on the Arctic

1 July, 2016 By Editor

The Pan-European Institute publishes a discussion forum, Baltic Rim Economies (BRE), which deals with the development of the Baltic Sea region. In the BRE review, high level public and corporate decision makers, representatives of Academia, as well as several other experts contribute to the discussion.

Special issue on the future of the Arctic was published on 20.6.2016.

Expert articles:

Ola Elvestuen: 20 years of peaceful cooperation in the Arctic
Aleksi Härkönen: The role of Finland in Arctic cooperation
Hannele Pokka: Clean technology brings new prospects in the north
Marja-Leena Vuorenpää: The role of Barents cooperation in the development of the European Arctic
Fujio Ohnishi: The Arctic concert system and its challenges
Liu Xu: China-Russian Arctic cooperation: black gold and beyond
Timo Laukkanen: Action to enable more sustainable business in the Arctic
Gunn-Britt Retter: Challenges and opportunities in the development of the Arctic region from the perspective of the Saami
Satu Miettinen: Arctic design: creating innovation and competitive edge in the north
Rauno Posio: Visit Arctic Europe: making cross-border cooperation
Susan Chatwood & Greg Poelzer: Social determinants of health in Arctic regions
Ilona Mettiäinen: There is no “one-size-fits-all” in Arctic climate change adaptation
Veli-Pekka Tynkkynen: Russia’s Arctic paradoxes
Daria Gritsenko: What does the case of Sabetta tell us about the relationship between energy and regional development?
Andrey Shadurskiy: Russia’s LNG projects in the Arctic: still on track?
Tomoko Tabata: Demographic trend in the Russian High North
Masahiro Tokunaga: The Russian Arctic and environmental discourse
Shinichiro Tabata: Research on the socio-economic development of the Russian Far North
Eini Haaja & Hanna Mäkinen: Need for international research on international business in the Russian Far North

Follow AER!
Facebooktwitterlinkedinrss

Communication & Actions in times of crisis

15 April, 2016 By Johanna Pacevicius

The Committees’ spring plenary meetings, gathered over 180 delegates from all over Europe in Timisoara (Timis, RO) from 11 to 14 April 2016 on the theme “Communication and Actions in times of crisis”. This series of more than 20 events included workshops, working groups, statutory meetings, study visits and a seminar.

The general theme of these events reflects the situation in Europe, the observation of the rise of populism, the oversimplification of complex issues and simultaneously a growing feeling of distrust amongst citizens. It fits also in the framework of the 2016 AER general theme “revitalising democracy”. Policy makers discussed questions such as “how can policy makers communicate better with citizens, listen to their needs and worries? “How to generate adherence?” “How to create a narrative which is engaging?”

Although perspectives vary and the situation is very different from one region to another, common findings include:

-the involvement of civil society is instrumental in generating adherence to policies and engagement in the implementation process. Fereshteh Jalayer, County Councillor from Värmland (SE) explained for instance that the involvement of NGOs and volunteers in the welcome of refugees had enabled the region to implement its generous refugee health policy while gaining support from local citizens without negative communication or rumours.

-awareness raising and information are necessary to counter false or partial information. Andreas Galster, from the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe, presented the work of the Congress on this topic and in particular highlighted a good practice from Barcelona (ES) where a public service campaign was rolled out to dispel rumours, misconceptions and prejudices via ‘anti-rumour agents’ who contradicted uninformed ideas about immigrants.

-media education was especially mentioned by Ovidiu Nahoi, Editor in chief at Radio France Internationale Romania: whereas social media has made it possible for all to publish articles, education is needed to sensitise citizens to source checking. This echoed a good practice showcased in Nordjylland at the last Spring Plenaries: an event was specially created to teach youth how to use twitter to interact with politicians, get access to more varied sources and high quality information.

Following the joint session 3 workshops allowed for more detailed discussions on :

– Migrant entrepreneurship & integration in the labour market

– Adaptation of health & social care systems to the refugee crisis

– Culture as an inclusion strategy

 

Visit the event page to find out about the Commmittee Spring Plenary meetings.

Follow AER!
Facebooktwitterlinkedinrss

Autumn Bureau & Equal Opportunities Forum

27 January, 2016 By Editor

Pictures and video

AER Bureau & Forum Equal Opportunities

 

Documents

Agenda
Political declaration – status quo is not an option for the European regions
List of participants
Presentation Cllr Roy Perry “A post-Brexit system”
Programme of events
Practical information

Background

The City of Vienna welcomed the AER members to a Bureau Meeting and a Forum on Equal Opportunities on 24 and 25 October 2016.

Bureau: “Europe after the Brexit: is status quo an option?”

The topic came naturally during the last Bureau meeting in Nordland  where members had the opportunity to exchange on the very hot issue of the British Referendum, which was about to take place on the next day. In his video message to the members, AER Vice-President for Institutional Affairs Roy Perry (Hampshire-UK) shared his hopes and fears, followed by a lively intervention from AER’s Honorary Vice-President Brian Greenslade (Devon-UK). The vast majority of the members sent clear signals in favor of a “Bremain“ rather than a “Brexit“… But the results of the referendum poured cold water on these hopes.

With its focus of the year on “revitalizing democracy“ and while waiting for the next steps from the British government and the EU institutions, the Assembly of European Regions proposes you to think further with a debate on “Europe after the Brexit: is status quo an option? ». Everyone agrees Europe lives a critical moment of its history, which also makes it a relevant moment to question it, challenge it, and reconsider it with new ideas coming from the regional level. Regions also share a part of responsibility and can certainly lead the way towards a brighter future, setting examples for others to follow.

Forum Equal Opportunities: “What does it mean to implement Human rights at regional level?”

How does this translate in practice for topics such as health or economic development?
How to organise and to create tools for human rights governance at regional level?
What are the consequences for citizens at large?

The speakers of the day provided expert insights from the OSCE, the Congress of Regional and Local Authorities and the Fundamental Rights Agency, as well as good practices from various Västra Götaland (SE), Lower Austria (AT) and Värmland (SE).

Study visit to the OSCE

The Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe was created in 1975, to serve as a multilateral forum for dialogue and negotiation between East and West. With 57 participating States, the OSCE has today a comprehensive approach to security that encompasses politico-military, economic and environmental, and human aspects. It therefore addresses a wide range of security-related concerns, including arms control, confidence- and security-building measures, human rights, national minorities, democratization, policing strategies, counter-terrorism and economic and environmental activities. Learn more about the OSCE here.

For this study visit, AER members received a general lecture about the history, roles and missions of the OSCE, before learning more about its work in the fields of gender equality and fight against terrorism.

Dutch EU Presidency focuses on four of AER’s main policies

25 January, 2016 By Editor

An agenda in line with AER’s

The Netherlands Presidency of the European Union (from January to June 2016) aims to promote prosperity, freedom and security in the EU during the next half year, by focusing on Migration, Innovation, Economy and Energy Policies. The Assembly of European Regions can provide a wealth of knowledge and experience from the regions about these themes, these being at the core of its engagement. This is especially relevant given AER’s 2016 focus on Revitalizing Democracy, with a number of topics and events in line with the priorities of the Netherlands Presidency.

Dutch regions

AER boasts a special relation with the Netherlands, through the participation in AER of three very dynamic Dutch Regions: Flevoland, Gelderland and Noord-Brabant. These provinces already cooperate with regions from across wider Europe inside AER  on the four core priorities of the Netherlands Presidency of the European Union, and will have a pivotal role in the next six months.

Priorities of the Netherlands EU Presidency

Migration & International Security. The Netherlands Presidency of the EU is committed to a common border control, asylum and migration Policy. AER’s longstanding experience in interregional cooperation is instrumental in the implementation of hands-on solution: we cannot afford to not take advantage of each others’ experience. Feedback from peers in other regions allows for agile policy making & implementation of sustainable solutions.

Innovation and Job Creation. During the next half year, the Netherlands will prioritise new jobs and innovation in the economy of the EU. This sounds as an acknowledgement of AER’s continuous commitment for entrepreneurship, youth employment and the silver economy. By carrying out peer reviews on smart jobs creation, youth employment, innovation policies, by supporting regions to boost entrepreneurship and more specifically youth entrepreneurship, by encouraging youth participation, AER has put relentless efforts in innovation and job creation. The AER Regional Innovation Award typically shows the incredible innovation potential of regions. The AER Summer Academy is another example of a highly succesful initiative for innovation and job creation.

Finance and Eurozone. The Netherlands Presidency wants to continue the ongoing reforms to ensure modern economies with healthy public finances. AER reiterates its position that decentralisation is correlated with economic growth. Healthy and sustainable public finances will only be achieved with a user-based and territorial approach.

Forward-Looking Climate & Energy Policy. The AER enthusiastically welcomes the decision of the Netherlands  to commit to a coherent approach on climate, the environment and sustainability. AER member regions have been strongly promoting sustainable energy policies for many years and can share their experience and findings on topics such as the implementation of regional strategies for renewable energies and energy efficiency or the developement of the funding market for RES.

Forthcoming AER meetings

Many of the above mentioned issues will be discussed in the coming Committees’ Plenary and Bureau meeting. In addition, the AER and the Dutch member regions will soon organise a Breakfast Briefing in Brussels on the current Presidency of the Council (more information soon).

More information

Visit the website of the Netherlands Presidency of the European Union

Contact the AER Secretariat for more information

Follow AER!
Facebooktwitterlinkedinrss

Pool of experts on regionalisation

AER relies on the expertise of academics and experts throughout Europe to ensure a proper understanding of the development of regionalisation in the different parts of the continent. These experts follow and monitor the key developments in their day-to-day activities and have agreed to share their insight with AER in view of gathering a truly cross-cutting picture of where regions are heading and how they are evolving.

We are proud to showcase their work and analyses and to share their views with our members and readers and we thank them for their trust and dedication to assist us in defending and promoting the interests of regions in Europe!

See the report on the state of regionalisation in Europe

 

General experts

Anne AZAM-PRADEILLES

Ms Azam-Pradeilles, French ENA graduate, international expert with an extensive experience in international cooperation, EU matters and Institutional Building, notably in the fields of public administration reform, governance, regional policy and capacity strengthening, in particular with the EU Twinning instrument, has graduated of the ENS of Cachan and Paris Sorbonne. She started her career as senior lecturer and research fellow in English at Paris V-René Descartes University. Since 1994, she has specialised in EU enlargement, then in European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) countries and more widely Africa, Asia and South America. She worked for public services and administration reforms in several countries: France, Latvia, Romania, Ukraine, Moldova, Niger, Morocco… Since 1996 she is a lecturer at ENA, notably in CISAP. Her present projects focus on public administration reform and regional policy, both East (ENP) and South (FED) – economic, social and territorial cohesion and the balance of powers between administrative levels being true challenges everywhere.

Amélie BARBIER-GAUCHARD

Amélie BARBIER-GAUCHARD ([email protected]) is Assistant Professor in Economics with the higher degree “Accreditation to Supervise Research » at the Faculty of Economics and Management at the University of Strasbourg. She conducts research in the BETA Research Unit (Bureau of Theoretical and Applied Economics). As expert in the multi-level governance of public finance within the EU, her research topics are economic policy, fiscal policy tools and European integration.

Nicolas BOUZOU

Nicolas Bouzou is a French economist born in 1976. He founded Asterès, a consultancy firm, in 2006. He is Director of Studies in the MBA Law & Management program at the University of Paris II Assas. He is a television columnist of the “Matinale” broadcast on the I-Télé channel. He often writes articles for the French press (Le Figaro, Les Echos, Le Monde) as well as for the foreign press (Financial Times, Le Temps). He sits on the Conseil d’Analyse de la Société to the Prime Minister (2010-2012). He is also part of the keyser Söze group directed by Jacques Attali which counts the 26 best French economists. He wrote numerous books, such as Le Chagrin des Classes Moyennes (JC Lattès, 2011), La Politique de la Jeunesse (avec Luc Ferry, Odile Jacob, 2012) and On Entend l’Arbre Tomber mais pas la Forêt Pousser (JC Lattès, 2013). He will publish on January 2015 by Jean-Claude Lattès the story of a travel around Europe called “Le Progrès c’est ici, Voyage chez les Européens qui aiment l’Avenir”. His area of work are economic policies, territorial organisation, health and the philosophy of progress.

Murat DAOUDOV

Murat Daoudov is university lecturer, senior international consultant and entrepreneur. He is skilled in leadership and communication in multi-cultural context, government relations, alternative diplomacy & negotiations, and international cooperation. He is founder and president of the Middle East Development Network (MDN), an international company specialized in public policy and development consulting, and lecturer at Marmara University.

Gratian MIHAILESCU

Gratian Mihailescu graduated in communication and public relations. He specialized in European Affairs, International Relations and Development receiving scholarships from different countries. He was Erasmus student at Eberhard Karl University of Tuebingen and Erasmus Mundus at Trento University, Italy and Corvinus University of Budapest. Between the two masters, he worked and studied in Brussels, doing a postgraduate course in project management and community advisor. Since 2012, Gratian Mihailescu is back to Romania and is a consultant and columnist, cooperating with various think tanks on public policy issues, or with consulting companies. His main area of focus are EU policies, EU funds, Regional Development, Democracy & Good-Governance, Regionalisation and Subsidiarity principle. In 2013, he established an NGO, Local Development Institute aiming to support activities and initiatives that contribute to local and regional development in West part of Romania. In 2016, he launches a new platform called UrbanizeHub, supported by the Assembly of European Regions.

Arjan SCHAKEL

Arjan Schakel is Assistant Professor at the Department of Political Science of Maastricht University and worked previously for VU University Amsterdam and the University of Edinburgh. His research interests span the topics of multilevel governance, federalism, territorial politics, regional government, European and regional elections, and regionalist parties. Arjan has published numerous articles in top political science journals and his books have been published by Oxford University Press, Palgrave Macmillan, and Routledge. He is a member of the management team of the Standing Group of Regionalism and Federalism’ of the European Consortium of Political Research (ECPR), he is special book series editor on the Palgrave Macmillan series on Comparative Territorial Politics, and he is a member of the editorial board of ‘Multi Level Governance watch’. Arjan’s publications, papers and datasets can be retrieved from his personal website.

Adriana SKORUPSKA

Adriana Skorupska is an analyst at the Polish Institute of International Affairs in the Eastern and South Eastern Europe Programme.
Her interests include the international cooperation of self-government, cross-border cooperation and the decentralization reforms in the Eastern Partnership Countries, especially in Georgia and Ukraine.

Anita SOBJÁK

Anita Sobják is an analyst at the Polish Institute of International Affairs.
She pursued her studies in Romania, the Netherlands and in Poland.
Her main area of focus is Central Europe and the Republic of Moldova. Within that regional context she deals with European and foreign policies of the individual states, V4 cooperation, energy security, post-1989 political and economic transition processes, as well as minority issues.

Melanie SULLY

Text goes here.

Country specific experts

Maura Adshead – Ireland

Maura Adshead, BA, MA (Limerick), Phd (Liverpool) is Senior Lecturer in Politics and Public Administration, Department of Politics and Public Administration at the University of Limerick.
She is author of Developing European Regions? Ashgate, 2002, co-author (with Jonathon Tonge) of Politics in Ireland, Palgrave, 2009; and co-editor of Public Administration and Public Policy in Ireland: theory and methods, Routledge 2003; Contesting the State: lessons from the Irish case, MUP, 2008, and FOI@15. An examination of Freedom of Information in Ireland, MUP, 2015.
She has published a variety of articles on aspects of Irish politics and public policy and has carried out commissioned research for Combat Poverty, the Health Service Executive and the National Economic and Social Forum.

Algirdas Astraukas – Lithuania

Algirdas Astrauskas is an associated professor of the Institute of Public administration; Faculty of Politics and Management of Mykolas Romeris University.
Before starting to work at Mykolas Romeris University in 2001 he held several senior advisory and management positions in the state government institutions, including Specialist Advisor to the President of the Republic of Lithuania and vice-minister in the Ministry of Interior. He has over 40 publications to his name on public administration, regional policy, local self-government, public finances, strategic management.

Peter Bussjäger – Austria

Peter Bußjäger studied Law at the University of Innsbruck. Since 1987, he is working as a Civil servant of the Land Vorarlberg. From 2000, he was Associate Professor at the Institute of Public Law, Financial Law and Political Science at the University of Innsbruck. In 2014, he became Professor of Public Law at the University of Innsbruck. Since 2013, he is also Researcher on Law at Liechtenstein-Institute in Bendern/Liechtenstein. His main research subjects are Federalism (European and Austrian), reform of administra-tion and basic legal problems. Since 2001, he is also Director of the Institute of Federalism, Innsbruck. From 2003 to 2012, he was Director of the state parliament (Landtag) of Vorarlberg.

Giancarlo Cotella – Poland

Giancarlo Cotella is Assistant Professor at Politecnico di Torino, where he concluded his doctoral studies in 2009. In recent years, he participated in several international research projects including, including the FP7 MILESECURE-2050, ESPON 2.3.1 ESDP, ESPON 2.3.2 Governance, ESPON FOCI, ESPON INSTED, ESPON TANGO and LisGo. Dr. Cotella’s research focuses on EU territorial governance and spatial planning domestic contexts and, in particular, on the Europeanization of spatial planning in the new EU Member States. He taught and researched in Germany, Poland, Estonia, England, and has been actively involved in the Coordination Unit of the Association of European Schools of Planning since 2005.

Iain Deas – United Kingdom

Iain Deas is an advisor to the Assembly of European Regions. He is a senior lecturer in Urban and Regional Planning at the University of Manchester. He is co-director of the university’s cross-disciplinary Centre for Urban Policy Studies.
He has published widely on the politics of urban regeneration and the governance of territorial policy, including recent articles on the development of city-regions (in Urban Studies, 2014), policy actor networks and sub-national economic development agencies in England (Local Economy, 2013), and agglomeration economics and regional policy (Environment and Planning A, 2014).

Annika Jaansoo – Estonia

Annika Jaansoo is lecturer, researcher and PhD student (“Providing public services across borders – why is it so rare among subnational governments within Europe?”) at the University of Tartu, Estonia.
In her lecturing courses, Ms Jaansoo focus on Public finance. Annika Jaansoo has been working in the public sector in the audit and planning and management field in Estonia from September 2010 to July 2014.
Through her work experience as Auditor (2012-2014), Development Manager (2010-2012) and Partner/Senior Consultant (2001-2002), Ms Jaansoo has expertise in compliance audit, project planning, budgeting for projects, preparation and managing EU structural Funds’ projects.

Martin Klatt – Denmark

After completing a M.A. in History, Political Science and Nordic Philology at the Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel in 1995, Martin Klatt became project associate at the Schleswig-Holstein Institute for Peace Research (Kiel, DE) in 1996 and research associate at the Studieafdelingen ved Dansk Centralbibliotek for Sydslesvig later on, from 1997 to 2000. In September 2001, Mr Klatt became assistant professor of Contemporary History IFG and got his Ph.D. from the University of Southern Denmark the year after.
In January 2004, the IFG was merged with the University of Southern Denmark and renamed “Department of Border Region Studies”. In 2005, Martin Klatt was named Associate Professor of Contemporary History.
Between September and December 2013, he finally worked as a visiting researcher at the University of Victoria (BC, Canada), for the Centre of Global Studies.

Cian Finn – Ireland

Cian Finn is a PhD candidate in the Department of Politics and Public Administration at the University of Limerick. He completed a Master of Arts in European Politics and Governance at the University of Limerick in 2012 and commenced PhD research in September 2013 under the supervision of Dr. Chris McInerney and Dr. Frank Häge. His PhD thesis analyses the depth of citizen and civil society participation in subnational government in Ireland.
His research interests include: Citizen Participation, Democratic Theory, Civic Engagement, Public Administration, Local Governance, and Public Policy.

Thomas Fleiner – Switzerland

Prof. Fleiner was Full Professor of the Law Faculty at the University of Fribourg (CH), specialised in General Theory of the State and Swiss Constitutional and Administrative Law (from 1971 to 2008).
He was also Director of the Institute of Federalism (1984-2008) and he has been Professor for general theory of state at the distant University of Brig since 2008.
He is President of the Curatorship of the Institute for European Constitutional Sciences of the Distant University Hagen Germany, member of the PhD Board of the University of Siena and member of the Centre of the European Constitutional Law (Tsatsos Foundation) in Greece.
His fields of Research and teaching are: Federalism, Rule of Law, Multicultural State Comparative Administrative and Constitutional Law, Political Theory and Philosophy, the Swiss Constitutional and Administrative Law as well as Legislative Drafting.

Davit Gabaidze – Georgia

After getting his PhD in administrative law at I. Javakhishvili State University in Georgia, Davit Gabaidze has been working as a lawyer since 2004. He worked, amongst others, for the Ministry of Finance and Economy of Ajara. He is currently a lecturer at the Batumi Shota Rustaveli State University, and since April 2014 Head of the Legal and Human Ressources Department of the Autonomous Republic of Ajara. He is member of several associations such as the Georgian Young lawyers Association, Batumi branch, and the Georgian Bar association.

Rémi Gayno – Russia

Rémi Gayno studied “International Relations and regional integration” at the renowed French school SciencesPo Strasbourg (Institut for political studies, University of Strasbourg).
He spent one year (2012/2013) at the Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO), during which he could familiarize with the Russian culture, increase his language skills, and deepen his knowledge in Russian history. His Master’s thesis was entitled: “The Franco-Soviet relations during the Euromissiles crisis from a journalistic point of view”. His aim was to analyse the dissensions, but also the coherence between the different views expressed in four newspapers (2 French and 2 Russian). Despite the fundamental differences of objective that the articles are serving, it is possible to identify a consistent picture of the crisis, which is particular to the journalistic world and different from the academic narrative. He would like to focus his future researches on the evolution of the Sino-Russian border, and its impact on the countries’ relations, especially related to the population living in the border area. Rémi Gayno was born and grew up in Tokyo. He can speak french, english, russian and german.

Jan Grasnick – Germany

Dr. Jan Grasnick is research associate at the Institute for Canadian Studies of the University of Augsburg. His research focuses on Democratization, analysis of multi-level systems (EU), processes of regionalization, policy analysis, and comparative politics.
Publications:
2012: Regionales Regieren und Demokratie in der Europäischen Union, in: Jan Grasnick / Katja Walter (Hrsg.): Politik in Nordamerika und Europa – Analysen, Theorien und literarische Rezeption, Wiesbaden, S. 162-176.
2009: Die bayerische Landtagswahl vom 28. September 2008 – Betriebsunfall oder Ende eines Mythos?, zusammen mit Rainer-Olaf Schultze, in: Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 40 (2009),1, S. 34 – 55.
2007: Regionales Regieren in der Europäischen Union – Bayern, Rhône-Alpes und Oberösterreich im Vergleich, Wiesbaden.

Nico Groenendijk – The Netherlands

Nico Groenendijk is professor of European Economic Governance at the Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social Sciences of the University of Twente, Netherlands. He is co-director of the Centre for European Studies. He has a background in public administration, public sector economics and EU studies. He has specialized in the EU budget, EU institutional development, economic policy coordination, and fiscal federalism. Recently he has done research into EU macro-regional strategies, cross-border cooperation in Europe, the role of regions in the Europe 2020 strategy, and the impact of EU regulation on subnational authorities in the Netherlands. Nico Groenendijk has been a visiting professor in Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Slovakia and South Africa. Currently he is visiting professor of European Studies at the European College of the University of Tartu, Estonia.

Mujo Hadzic – Bosnia and Herzegovina

Mujo Hadzic is currently head of Section for Coordination of EU Aid Programs and Regional Cooperation of the Government of Brcko District of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Previously, he worked at many different positions, dealing with the coordination of EU assistance projects. From 1997 to 2002, he was also involved in the International Police Task Force / UN Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina as language assistant to the Special Response Unit. He is writing a PhD about “The role of culture-specific values in Conflict Management and Psychological Operations”(University of Belgrade).

Ulla Higdem – Norway

Ulla Higdem is Dr.scient and associate professor at the Faculty of Economics and Organization Science at Lillehammer University College. She is affiliated with the Centre of Innovation in Services – public and private. She has a background in the field of regional planning and developmental work and has been the administrative leader of the Eastern Norway County Network, which at that time represented Norway’s counties at the board of the AER (1994-97). Dr. Higdem undertook her doctoral studies at the Department of Landscape Architecture and Spatial Planning at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (2007). Her Dr.scient. thesis, “Regional partnerships and their constructions and implementations”, is a case study of three counties in Norway and their partnerships that were constructed to enhance regional development. Her research is focused on such regional issues as policy-making and innovation, planning, directing and governance structures, and regional foresight. Dr. Higdem’s research interests include the new and changing forms of directing, steering (governance), and planning – regional partnerships, innovative networks and processes for regional and local planning and development, deliberation, partaking and partnership in a democratic perspective, and meta-governance.

Pekka Kettunen – Finland

Pekka Kettunen defended his doctoral thesis in 1994 at the University of Turku. The thesis analysed the various theories of implementation research, and tested the bottom-up-approach empirically.  Since then Dr. Kettunen has worked also at the Abo Akademi University, Tampere University and Jyväskylä University and published over one hundred scientific publications in the areas of policy analysis, evaluation, local government research, comparative analysis, and democracy. He has recently co-authored articles in Local Government Studies, Regional and Federal Studies, and Evidence & Policy. He has also co-edited two special issues of journals: in 2012, Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration, on evaluation, and in 2013, Halduskultuur (Administrative Culture) on decentralization and governance. Dr. Kettunen has given presentations in several Japanese Universities and made longer visit to several European Universities in the U.K., Denmark, Estonia, Croatia and Slovenia. He has also conducted evaluation for Icelandic, Estonian and Slovenian Research Agencies. His current research interests include the issue of effectiveness of public interventions, as well as the methods applied in analyzing impacts.

Nikolaos-Komninos Hlepas – Greece

Nikolaos-Komninos Hlepas is Associate Professor (specialised in Regional Government and Self Government) within the Department of Political Science and Public Administration at the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. He studied Law in Athens and got his PhD (in Law) in Bremen (DE). His main teaching and research topics are: Regional Administration and Local Self Government, Comparative Public Administration, Local Public Sector Reforms, Political Leadership, Administrative Modernization, Democracy, Public Law. He has published several books and articles in Greek, English, German and French and has been Deputy Chair of the Committee that drafted the law on the “Kallikratis” Reform project. Prof. Hlepas has also been the Chairman of the National School of Public Administration and Local Government, in Athens (2010-2012).
Finally, he is Ordinary Member of the Independent Group of Experts of the Council of Europe – Congress of Local Authorities and Regions (ECLR).

Snežana Kresoja – Serbia

After graduating from the Faculty of Political Science, University of Belgrade, Snežana Kresoja became adviser to the President of the Assembly of the Autonomous Province of Vojvodina, Republic of Serbia.Areas of professional interests are: processes of democratic transition and institutional consolidation as the cardinal stone of political, economic, social post-communist transformation, issues of facing/dealing with the past as well as identity politics – understanding and acceptance of European values and standards as a basic concept of strengthening and building up multidimensional European identity patterns.

Santiago Lago-Peñas – Spain

Prof. Lago-Peñas has been Full Professor of Applied Economics at the University of Vigo, Spain, since 2011 and is at the head of the Department of Applied Economics. He is also executive director for the Governance and Economics research Network (webs.uvigo.es/infogen) and co-director (with Jorge Martínez-Vázquez – Georgia State University) of the RIFDE (www.rifde.es).
Moreover, he has been Associate editor of Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics since 2012 and member of the Editorial Board of European Journal of Government and Economics since 2011.He is an expert called by several organisations such as the Forum of Federations and the Argentine Senate, the Agence Française de Développement, the Corporación Andina de Fomento (Peru), and, of course, the AER. Prof. Lago-Peñas has been working as an expert for the Directorate-General for Regional Policy in the appraisal, Implementation and mentoring of cohesion policy interventions, (2012-) and also worked for the reform of the Spanish regional financing system (Ministry of Finance 2006-2008), for the Spanish R+D+i plan (in 2012) as well as for the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. He was also Counselor at the Galician Socioeconomic Council (2003-2011), consultant for the regional government of Andalusia (2005) and currently is adviser and consultant for the regional government of Galicia (2005-).

Damir Magaš – Croatia

Prof. Damir Magaš is the head of the Centre for Karst and Coastal Research, University of Zadar (HR), (since 2007) as well as Full Professor of Regional Geography (esp. Geography of Croatia), Geoaspects of Regionalization and Spatial Planning and Urban Geography for the Department of Geography at the same University. He completed a BA in Geography (1975), a MA in Urban Geography (1983) and a PhD. also in Geography (1992). He was Spatial and Urban Planer (1976-1993), Head of the Department of Geography in Zadar (1994-2000), Dean of the Faculty of Arts in Zadar (2000-2003), Rector of the University of Zadar (2002-2007), Member of the Zadar-Knin County Government (1993-1997), and Zadar County Government (2000-2004).
Prof Magaš also led various research projects such as Geographical Bases of Small Croatian Islands Development (1996-2006) or Geographical Bases of Croatian Littoral Regions Development (2006-2013). His special interests are regional geography of Croatia, processes of regionalization, historical geography and urban geography.
Publications:
2013: Geografija Hrvatske / Geography of Croatia, Sveučilište u Zadru / University of Zadar, Meridijani, Zadar, p. 600.
2011: The Concept of Territorial Organisation of Adriatic Croatia, Geoadria 16/2, Zadar, 211-236.
2005: Croatia: Towards the Concept of Euroregions, in: Anton Gosar (ed.), Globalized Europe, Annales, Univerza na Primorskem, Koper, 2005, 247-258.
2003: Contemporary Aspects of the Geographical Regionalization and Administrative-Territorial Organization of Croatia, Geoadria, 8/1, Zadar, 127-147.

Enrico Martial – Italy

Enrico Martial (1962) graduated in Philosophy, served at EIPA (European Institute for Public Administration) in Maastricht, at the Valle d’Aosta Region, at the Italian Ministry of Public Works and at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Director of the Italian Conference of Presidents of Regional Assemblies, he has been Secretary General of the Conference of European Regional Legislative Assemblies (CALRE).
He wrote articles on EU integration and Italian affairs in national and international reviews (Il Mulino, Relazioni internazionali, Limes Economia Exterior”, and Raum – Österreichische Zeitschrift für Raumplanung und Regionalpolitik).

Gratian Mihailescu – Romania

Gratian Mihailescu graduated in communication and public relations. He specialized in European Affairs, International Relations and Development receiving scholarships from different countries. He was Erasmus student at Eberhard Karl University of Tuebingen and Erasmus Mundus at Trento University, Italy and Corvinus University of Budapest. Between the two masters, he worked and studied in Brussels, doing a postgraduate course in project management and community advisor.
Since 2012, Gratian Mihailescu is back to Romania and is a consultant and columnist, cooperating with various think tanks on public policy issues, or with consulting companies. His main area of focus are EU policies, EU funds, Regional Development, Democracy & Good-Governance, Regionalisation and Subsidiarity principle.
In 2013, he established an NGO, Local Development Institute aiming to support activities and initiatives that contribute to local and regional development in West part of Romania.

Ilona Pálné Kovács – Hungary

Ilona Pálné Kovács (1954), graduated as a lawyer, defended her PhD in political science, and was elected as a corresponding member of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in 2013.
She is a scientific adviser in the Institute for Regional Studies, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, HAS and full time professor at the Department for Political and International Studies of University of Pécs. She is a leader of PhD programme in political science here. The focus of doctoral programme led by her is territorial, time and social aspects of governance.
Her scientific interests are regional governance and local governments, management of regional policy teaching also public administration and constitutional law. She was a leader and participant of many domestic and international research projects among them several EU framework, ESF, INTERREG, TEMPUS, ESPON, UNESCO, EC DG Regio programmes.
She has published several books and hundreds of scientific articles. She is a member of several national and international professional organisations (like ESF, IGU, RSA, NISPACee)

Primož Pevcin – Slovenia

Primož Pevcin is currently an associate professor for public sector economics and management at University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Administration.
He defended his doctoral dissertation in 2004, and thesis focused on the empirical verification of factors affecting size of government as well as on the possible determination of the optimal size of government.
His research interests are widely associated with the public sector economics and management topics, including also subnational government financing and organization. This involves addressing the topics like intergovernmental transfers, efficiency of subnational governments, economics of decentralization and regionalization, subnational government consolidations etc.
He has been involved in several national and international research projects that addressed various public sector issues. During his career he has also performed several managerial posts at the faculty, where he served as a vice-dean for international cooperation and scientific research, and currently as a vice-dean for academic affairs.

Paul-Henri Philips – Belgium

Paul-Henri Philips obtained a Master in Public Management (with mention) from the Solvay Brussels School in 1997.
Since january 2001, he is European and International Coordinator at the Region of Brussels.
Since december 2013, he is also President of the European Committee on Democracy and Governance (CDDG) at the Council of Europe.

Lee Pugalis – United Kingdom

Lee Pugalis is an advisor to the Assembly of European Regions. He holds a Readership at Newcastle Business School, Northumbria University where he leads the Research group for Economic Development, Innovation and Entrepreneurship (REDIE). Before taking up an academic position at Northumbria University in 2010 he held several senior management and advisory positions across local, regional and national government, including Specialist Advisor to a Regional Development Agency.Lee has over 100 publications to his name, is the UK Editor of Local Economy and Early Career Editor of Regional Studies, Regional Science, and is a World Social Science Fellow.

Māris Pūķis – Latvia

Māris Pūķis is lecturer at the University of Latvia (Associate Professor). He is the author of more than 200 articles in matters of public administration and regional development. In a range of papers, he proves the potentially positive impact of regional governments on the social and economic development of Latvia in the future.
He was a self-government politician during the period from 1989 until 1994.
Since 1994, he has been working at LALRG, the Latvian Association of Local and Regional Governments.

Pablo Simón-Cosano – Spain

Dr. Simón-Cosano is a current member of the ESCE project: This project aims at contributing to people’s understanding of electoral systems in Europe, giving access for 31 European countries to the details of the electoral system they have used since their first democratic elections for the lower chamber. The project also provides people with access to the electoral laws of these 30 countries (in national language and in English for some articles). Secondly, researchers of the ESCE project produce analysis and research notes on the adoption and transformation of electoral systems in Europe. Dr. Cosano works as a Postdoc. Researcher for the CEVIPOL at the Université Libre of Brussels.

Malin Stegmann McCallion – Sweden

Dr. Malin Stegmann McCallion is currently a Senior Lecturer in Political Science at Karlstad University. Dr Stegmann McCallion’s research interests covers the regional level in society with focus on what role it has and how this role is changing. Of special interest are processes of Europeanisation, Multi-level Governance and Sub-state Diplomacy / Paradiplomacy. Her research mainly focuses on the Swedish regionalisation processes in a ‘EU’ropean perspective. She has published in Journal of European Integration, Regional and Federal Studies, and Regional Studies. Dr Stegmann McCallion undertook her doctoral studies at the Institute of Governance, Public Policy and Social Research, Queen’s University, Belfast, Northern Ireland (PhD awarded 2005). Her PhD thesis was titled ‘EU’ropeanisation: Challenges to Regional Administrative Structure and Regional Policy in Sweden. She has previously held lectureship posts at University of Limerick, University College Dublin both in the Republic of Ireland and she was a Research Fellow at Department of International Politics Aberystwyth University, Wales before moving back to her native country and to Karlstad University. Dr Stegmann McCallion is currently working with Professor Alex Warleigh-Lack (University of Surrey), Associate Professor Philomena Murray (University of Melbourne) ‘awkward partners’ in regional integration.

Lorena Totoni – Albania

Lorena Totoni (1972) graduated in Hydrotechnical Engineering from Tirana Polytechnic University and completed a Master in Public Administration at Economy Faculty of Tirana University. She has worked for more than a decade in the field of Regional Development and European Relations, holding the position of Director for Regional Development and International Relations at Tirana Region. She has a rich background in the field of regional and strategic planning, regional policy, policy-making, international policy, project management, directing, governance structures, developmental work, regional partnerships and community development. Since 2014, Mrs. Totoni works also as assistant professor at the Management Department of Economy Faculty, Tirana University. Her thesis of Public Administration Master consisted in a deep research study about “Regional Development in Albania under the framework of European Integration” – an analysis of the preconditions for effective implementation of EU Regional Development policies in the Albanian context.

Vesselina Troeva – Bugaria

Vesselina Troeva is the executive director of the National Centre for Regional Development as well as professor in Landscape and Urban Planning at the University of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy in Sofia. She was contractor and coordinator of the project for establishing the first planning major in Bulgaria in collaboration with Herriot Watt University (GB) and the University College of Dublin, accredited in 2002 and leading to Planning being recognised in the National Classification of Professions and Occupations in 2006. Mrs Troeva has been named “honourable member of the Royal Town Planning Institute” and is vice president of the AESOP (1994-1998) and member of the Best Planning Publication Commission (2004-2008). To be stressed is also her participation in over 25 international projects funded by the World Bank, EU, UKKHF, BC and SFS, among which “Urban Knowledge Arena” and “Urban Crime prevention” COST actions and a BC Creative Collaborations project “Children City Culture Concept (4C)”. She acted as a team leader of many large-scale pilot projects such as the National Concept for Spatial Development of Bulgaria (2013-2025), the Integrated Plan for Urban Regeneration and Development of Sofia 2020 and the Strategy for development of Sofia-city district 2014-2020. She also received three national awards from the UAB for innovative planning (1997, 1999, 2000) and from ESRI for GIS (greographic information systems) implementation in planning (2000). She has contributed to more than 100 publications in national and international media.

Partners

The Assembly of European Regions develops and maintains relationships with a wide range of thematic and geographic networks, organisations and institutions for the benefit of its members. Structured cooperation with an increasing number of relevant partners enables the AER to position itself as a forward-looking network.

INSTITUTIONS & ADVISORY BODIES

European Union

European Committee of the Regions (CoR)

The European Committee of the Regions (CoR) is the voice of regions and cities in the EU. It represents local and regional authorities across the European Union and advises on new laws that have an impact on regions and cities. A pillar of multi-level governance, it has the mission to involve regional and local authorities in the European decision-making process and thus to encourage greater participation from our fellow citizens. CoR members are grouped according to their political affiliation.

  • Cohesion Alliance

The #CohesionAlliance is a coalition of those who believe that EU Cohesion Policy must continue to be a pillar of the EU’s future. Since its launch in October 2017, the Alliance’s gathered together more than 12 000 individual signatories, 140 regions, 137 cities and counties, 50 associations of regional and local governments, 40 Members of the European Parliament and 35 EU sectoral associations.

  • Commission for Citizenship, Governance, Institutional and External Affairs (CIVEX)

The Commission for Citizenship, Governance, Institutional and External Affairs (CIVEX) is responsible for coordinating the Committee of the Regions’ work on constitutional and institutional issues, the area of freedom, security and justice, and the EU’s external dimension, focusing on enlargement and neighbourhood countries and on development cooperation from a local and regional angle.​

  • Integration Initiative – Cities and Regions for Integration of Migrants

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Cities and Regions for Integration of Migrants initiative provides a political platform for European mayors and regional leaders to showcase positive examples of integration of migrants and refugees, share relevant information and promote diversity as an added value to building inclusive cities and ensuring social cohesion.

Council of Europe (CoE)

  • Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe

The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities is an institution of the Council of Europe, responsible for strengthening local and regional democracy in its 46 member states and assessing the application of the European Charter of Local Self-Government. As the voice of Europe’s municipalities and regions, it works to foster consultation and political dialogue between national governments and local and regional authorities, through cooperation with the Council of Europe’s Committee of Ministers.

  • Committee of Experts on Intercultural Integration of Migrants (ADI-INT)

The Committee of Experts on Intercultural Integration of Migrants (ADI-INT) assists the Steering Committee on Anti-Discrimination and Inclusion (CDADI) in steering the Council of Europe’s intergovernmental work to promote equality for all and build more inclusive societies, offering effective protection from discrimination and hate and where diversity is respected.

  • Intercultural Cities Programme (ICC)

The Intercultural Cities Programme supports cities and regions in reviewing and adapting their policies through an intercultural lens, and developing comprehensive intercultural strategies to manage diversity as an advantage for the whole society.

  • Steering Committee on Anti-Discrimination, Diversity and Inclusion (CDADI)

The Steering Committee on Anti-Discrimination, Diversity and Inclusion (CDADI) steers the Council of Europe’s intergovernmental work to promote equality for all and build more inclusive societies that offer effective protection from discrimination and hate and where diversity is respected.

United Nations (UN)

  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)

The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) works in about 170 countries and territories, helping eradicate poverty, reduce inequalities and exclusion, and build resilience so countries can sustain progress. As the UN’s development agency, UNDP plays a critical role in helping countries achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.

  • United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE)

The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) is one of five regional commissions of the United Nations. Its major aim is to promote pan-European economic integration. UNECE includes 56 member States in Europe, North America and Asia. However, all interested United Nations member States may participate in the work of UNECE.

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)

The UNFCCC secretariat (UN Climate Change) is the United Nations entity tasked with supporting the global response to the threat of climate change. The ultimate objective of all three agreements under the UNFCCC is to stabilise greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that will prevent dangerous human interference with the climate system, in a time frame which allows ecosystems to adapt naturally and enables sustainable development.

  • International Organization for Migration (IOM)

The International Organization for Migration (IOM) is part of the United Nations System as the leading inter-governmental organization promoting since 1951 humane and orderly migration for the benefit of all, with 175 member states and a presence in over 100 countries. IOM works in the four broad areas of migration management that is to say migration and development, facilitating and regulating migration, and forced migration.

Organization for Economic Co-operation Development (OECD) 

  • Regional Development Policy Committee 

The OECD Regional Development Policy Committee (RDPC) was established in 1999. It works to improve living standards and well-being fro citizens from all regions, cities and rural area by designing and implementing effective place-based policies. By providing internationally comparable subnational data, the Committee is able to inform global debates on regional, urban, rural and water policy, subnational finance and multi-level governance.

MEDIA NETWORKS & INFORMATION HUBS

  • Cafébabel

Cafébabel is the first multilingual participatory magazine. The online magazine is a unique platform in which a network of volunteer authors, translators, filmmakers and photographers work together to report on the daily lives of young Europeans. Cafébabel is published by Babel International, an NGO based in France.

  • EURACTIV

EURACTIV is an independent pan-European media network specialised in EU affairs, established in 1999. It covers EU policy processes upstream of decisions and spreads across eight thematic clusters: Agrifood, Economy, Energy & Environment, Global Europe, Health, Politics, Technology, and Transport.

  • Europe Direct Strasbourg

Europe Direct Strasbourg informs the general public of the European Union’s programs and policies, as well as the life of all the European institutions located in Strasbourg through informative brochures, exhibitions and various activities.

  • Promote Ukraine

Promote Ukraine is a Brussels-based media platform for expertise and civil society initiatives for Ukraine and the EU. It is also a civil society and advocacy organisation established during the Revolution of Dignity in Brussels, European Citizen’s Prize Awardee 2022.

INTERNATIONAL NETWORKS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS 

  • Global Taskforce of Local and Regional Governments

The Global Taskforce of Local and Regional Governments is a coordination and consultation mechanism that brings together the major international networks of local governments to undertake joint advocacy work relating to global policy processes. It was set up in 2013 to bring the perspectives of local and regional governments to the SDGs, climate change agenda and New Urban Agenda in particular.

  • Regions4 

Regions4 represents regional governments (states, regions and provinces) before UN negotiations, European Union initiatives and global discussions in the fields of climate change, biodiversity and sustainable development. Regions4 was established in 2002 at the World Summit in Johannesburg as the Network of Regional Governments for Sustainable Development and it represents 41 regional governments from 21 countries in 4 continents.

  • United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG)

The World Organization of United Cities and Local Governments (UCLG) is a voluntary international alliance of associations, unions and individual municipalities established in 2004 in order to represent rights of citizens at the level of local self-government. UCLG is committed to representing, defending and amplifying the voices of local and regional governments to leave no one and no places behind.

CIVIL SOCIETIES ORGANISATIONS | NGOs | THINK THANKS

  • Acting Collectively to bridge Space and Society (EURISY)

The Active Collectively to bridge Space and Society (EURISY) raises awareness of emerging satellite applications which can help professional communities in many sectors of application: from transport to risk management, from habitat protection to energy.

  • Association for European Border Regions (AEBR)

The Association of European Border Regions (AEBR) was founded in 1971 by the first border regions which had started cross-border cooperation in Europe after the Second World War, strengthening the integration of citizens across national boundaries. AEBR works on behalf of European border and cross-border regions to highlight their role in the political landscape, to represent their common interests, to enhance cooperation between border regions throughout Europe, and to promote exchanges of experiences, information and solutions to common obstacles.

  • Association of North East Asia Regional Governments (NEAR)

The Association of North East Asia Regional Governments (NEAR) is an independent cooperative organization that strives to achieve mutual development and cooperative exchange in Northeast Asia, consisting of metropolitan and local self-governing governments of six countries such as states, provinces, prefectures, aimags, and metropolitan cities.

  • Developing Youth Participation at Local Level (DYPALL)

DYPALL Network (Developing Youth Participation at Local Level) is a European platform of over 80 civil society organisations and local authorities from more than 30 countries that aims to involve young people in decision-making processes at local level. It enables municipal and regional authorities to address the needs and interests of youth, engage young people as active actors of problem-solving and increase the level of ownership, commitment and involvement of an important part of our communities.

  • Emperor Maximilian Prize of the City of Innsbruck and the Region of Tyrol

The Prize honours and supports European togetherness and offers incentives for further concepts. AER President Magnus Berntsson is a Patron of the Prize, and YRN Vice-President Norbert Nagy is a member of their Jury, in 2023.

  • Europa-Forum Wachau
  • European Association for Local Democracy (ALDA)

ALDA – European Association for Local Democracy – was established in 1999 at the initiative of the Council of Europe. It is a global alliance of local and regional authorities and civil society actors working together with a participative approach for resilient, inclusive and sustainable communities. 

  • European Countryside Movement (ECM)

The European Countryside Movement (ECM) is a platform gathered around specific initiatives and/or position papers. Without legal or politic personality, it values the specific NGOs partners while respecting their identity and diversity.

  • European Network of Political Foundations (ENoP) 

ENoP serves as an umbrella network and information hub on topics related to democracy and development cooperation. As such, it provides its members a joint platform to engage into a coordinated dialogue with EU institutions, CSOs and other relevant stakeholders.

  • European Regions Research and Innovation Network (ERRIN)

The European Regions Research and Innovation Network (ERRIN) is a Brussels-based platform of Research and Innovation Organisations and Stakeholders in Regions. ERRIN aims to strengthen regional Research and Innovation capacities.

  • European Youth Forum (EYF)

The European Youth Forum (EYF) is the platform of youth organisations in Europe representing more than 100 youth organisations. It works to empower young people to participate actively in society to improve their own lives by representing and advocating their needs and interests and those of their organisations.

  • Foundation of European Regions for Education and Training (FREREF)

The Foundation of European Regions for Education and Training (FREREF) is the instrument European Regions have adopted in the field of education and training to create a forum for exchanges and cooperation. It supports regions and territorial actors in the implementation of Lifelong Learning policies and promotes the collaboration of these actors on a transnational and European scale.

  • Institute of European Environmental Policy (IEEP)

The Institute for European Environmental Policy is a sustainability think tank that works with stakeholders across EU institutions, international bodies, academia, civil society and industry. Its team of economists, scientists and lawyers produce evidence-based research and policy insight.

  • Institute of Innovative Governance

The Institute of Innovative Governance is an NGO and a think tank that advocates for digital inclusion, digital rights, and inclusive digital governance.

  • Local Authorities Major Group

The Local Authorities Major Group gathers a number of networks of local and sub‑national governments working on sustainable development policies and programmes that are willing to engage in the international negotiation processes. Through its links with the Global Taskforce it reaches all relevant networks – thematic, regional and global – working for local governments internationally.

  • MIHealth Management & Clinical Innovation Forum

The MIHealth Management & Clinical Innovation Forum is working on an innovative and renovated scientific programme focused on the new challenges of the Health System and how to applied new technologies to enhance the efficiency of the Hospital Management Systems.

  • NECStouR

NECSTouR is the Network of European Regions for Sustainable and Competitive Tourism. Based in Brussels, it develops Interregional Projects and fosters cooperation to enable Sustainable Tourism Governance in Europe.

  • Network of European Regions Using Space Technologies (NEREUS)

The Network of European Regions Using Space Technologies (NEREUS) is an initiative by regions from all over Europe emphasising the use of space technologies. The network represents the interests of European regions that use space technologies whilst simultaneously highlighting the regional dimension of European space policy and programmes.

  • Share Network – ICMC Europe

Established in March 2012 by ICMC Europe, Share Network supports regions, cities, towns, and rural communities interested in welcoming refugees and migrants.

  • Oru Fogar 

Oru Fogar is an organisation working on interregional cooperation and advocacy acting as a speaker for the regions.

  • Young European Federalists

The Young European Federalists (JEF Europe) is a political youth NGO advocating for the creation of a democratic European federation as a guarantee for peace, the rule of law and human rights. JEF Europe promotes true European citizenship, works for the widening and deepening of the European Union and strives for a more just and integrated society on the European continent and beyond. Established in 1972, the organisation has more than 10,000 activists organised in over 250 national, regional and local sections in 33 countries. 

  • Zero Project

The Zero Project’s mission is working for a world with zero barriers. Worldwide, the Zero Project finds and shares models that improve the daily lives and legal rights of all persons with disabilities

  • World Health Organisation’s Regions for Health Network (WHO-RHN)

The WHO-Regions for Health Network is the authority responsible for public health within the United Nations system. The WHO Regional Office for Europe (WHO/Europe) is one of WHO’s six regional offices around the world.

  • World Investment Conference (WIC)

The World Investment Conference (WIC) runs the leading conferences on cross-border investments. These unique platforms are dedicated to stimulating and facilitating FDI from around the world to specific and targeted countries or regions.

ORGANISATIONS OF REGIONAL GOVERNMENTS

  • Regions of Climate Action (R20)

The Regions of Climate Action (R20) is a non-profit organisation headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, founded in 2011 by former Governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger, and other global leaders in cooperation with the United Nations. R20 aims to help regional governments develop and implement projects, policies, and best practices for low-carbon green growth economic development in the face of climate change.

EU-AER PROJECT PARTNERS

  • Attractiveness Research Territory (ART-ER) – Project partners: EU-Belong

ART-ER Attractiveness Research Territory is the Emilia-Romagna Joint Stock Consortium born  with the purpose of fostering the region’s sustainable growth by developing innovation and knowledge, attractiveness and internationalisation of the  territory.

  • Cafébabel – Project Partners: YOUTHopia
  • Centre for Social Innovation (CSI) – Project Partners: CUBES

Cyprus-based NGO collective experiences in the fields of Education, System Rationalization, Information & Communications Technologies, Entrepreneurship, Social Innovation, Global Health Process – Life Sciences, Business Forensic Intervention, Youth Development & Motivation, and Resource Realignment with Goals and Objectives.

  • European Youth Forum (EYF) – Project Partners: MEET
  • ICEI – Project Partners: EU-Belong

ICEI works with people and local communities to improve social and economic conditions and to promote inclusive, fair and sustainable societies with a participatory approach.

  • International Organisation for Migration (IOM) – Project Partners: Includ-EU

Established in 1951, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) is the leading intergovernmental organisation in the field of migration and is committed to the principle that humane and orderly migration benefits migrants and society. IOM is part of the United Nations system, as a related organisation.

  • International VET Association (IVETA) – Projects Partners: SKILLNET

IVETA (International Vocational Education and Training Association) is a network of vocational educators that includes vocational skills training organisations, business and industrial firms, individuals and groups interested or involved in vocational education and training worldwide.

  • JEF Europe – Project Partners: I Choose Europe; Y-FED; MEET
  • Skillman International Forum – Project Partners: SKILLNET

The Skillman International Forum is part of a long journey in skills development where international keynote speakers, sponsors, partners, and participants work together to achieve common goals aiming at improving education and TVET. The AER participated at the Skillman International Forum as speaker, partner and contributor in 2020, 2021, and 2022 editions.

A Mutual-learning Community

Since its inception in 1985, the AER has always had at its core to facilitate experience exchange and policy learning. The community the AER creates between its member regions, which have both very diverse contexts and shared challenges, is an essential element for mutual learning to happen.

Facilitating the knowledge flow

Knowledge in the AER is incremental and never static. Members present a practice that works, share a concern or an idea for joint action. Then this leads to experience exchange in an event, a working group or a project. When new findings arise within these contexts, the results are brought back to the network and inspire other regions.

The AER provides a framework for its members to initiate mutual learning activities on any topic relevant to regional policymaking. This can be done through:

  • thematic events (see our Knowledge Transfer Toolkit to get a glimpse of the variety of possibilities)
  • thematic working groups
  • bilateral peer-to-peer meetings
  • knowledge transfer activities organised in the context of EU co-funded projects

The main idea is to make it easy for AER members to engage in exchanges with peers across wider Europe. To get feedback, share ideas, and develop joint initiatives.

Peer learning for policy innovation

Peer learning supports innovation in the public sector, via the sharing of good practices, but also by creating spaces of trust and exchanges where policymakers can get feedback, test ideas, find a community to inspire and support their regional initiatives.

Having an international network is instrumental for the development and implementation of new policies and practices in the regions. It encourages connectors, bridge-builders, and catalysts for change, to further connect diverse stakeholders and develop or support new initiatives.

Read more about the AER network.

The Knowledge Transfer Facilitator

The AER has built an expertise in peer learning and knowledge transfer, which is widely recognised among institutions and partners.

From the famed regional peer review methodology developed back in 2006 and used in several EU-funded projects on topics such as sustainable energy communities, financing of renewable energy infrastructure, the creation of innovation-based jobs or regional strategies for sustainable tourism, to the AER mutual learning events which gathered politicians, academia, NGOs and business on hot topics such as digital health innovation, artificial intelligence, the sharing economy, industry 4.0 and innovation in the food value chain, the AER has constantly been gathering stakeholders across silos to exchange and learn from each other.

Contact

Johanna Pacevicius

Mobile: +33 6 24 29 19 37 E-mail: j.pacevicius(at)aer.eu Languages: fr, nl, en, pt Articles by Johanna
  • Thematic Coordination
  • Committees
  • Mutual Learning

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • Next Page »
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

AER Projects

  • Ongoing projects
    • EU-BELONG: An Intercultural Approach to Migrant Integration in Europe’s Regions
    • MEET: Mobilise Europe = Engage Together
    • CL-YE | Climbing the Ladder: Fostering a Culture of Youth Engagement
  • Partner search

Library

Statutory Documents
AER Strategies
Minutes
Media Kit
Activity Reports
Newsletters
European Regions Map

Join AER!

Become a Member

Job Opportunities

Sign up for our Newsletter

Website map

Brussels · Strasbourg · Alba Iulia

A Network, a Partner and a Voice of European regions, since 1985 · Copyright © 2025 · Assembly of European Regions · [email protected] · Log in